Is pack leadership based domination or the parental bond?
The dominance theory originates in the work of Rudolph Schenkel who studied captive wolves in
Zoo Basel in 1947 in which he proposed the existence of an alpha wolf, that had
fought his way to dominate the pack. He also drew on many comparisons with dogs
to support his hypothesis as well as giving personal anecdotes about his own
dogs. Further weight was given to this theory in 1970 when Meech published “The
Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species” based on studies of
wolves in Michigan's Isle Royale National Park. However as time went on studies
moved onto wolves in the wild, and began understand that the wolf dominance
theory was fundamentally flawed as wolf packs in the wild were related by
blood, that is to say a male and a female would form a partnership and their
off-spring would become the pack, so leadership was on the basis of the
parental bond rather than domination. As the cubs grew up they would move on,
find a mate and begin their own packs. On the other hand, captive packs were
artificially created from disparate wolves with no paternal bond and so
“dominant” behaviour manifested in order to create a pecking order. Ensuing
studies of dogs over the years have largely repudiated the parallels between
wolves and dogs on account of the artificial selection process that has made
dogs behaviourally and physically distinct despite having in 98.8% of their DNA
in common.
Comments
Post a Comment